An empirical analysis: practices of Italian courts on dual preliminarity (2018-2022). A mixed response ORLANDO SCARCELLO TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction Context: Shaping the 269-Doctrine Methodology Results Notable Cases Conclusion Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostEditorial. New threats to Academic freedom Next PostDual preliminarity in comparative law You Might Also Like EDITORIAL – LEAVING CHEVRON BEHIND? February 12, 2025 GROUNDBREAKERS: FEMALE JUSTICES AND PRESIDENTS IN THE ITALIAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT February 12, 2025 MANAGING POST-PANDEMIC RECOVERY.THE NORMALISATION OF EMERGENCY SOCIO-ECONOMIC MEASURES IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN [CONSTITUTIONAL] LANDSCAPES February 12, 2025
MANAGING POST-PANDEMIC RECOVERY.THE NORMALISATION OF EMERGENCY SOCIO-ECONOMIC MEASURES IN DIFFERENT EUROPEAN [CONSTITUTIONAL] LANDSCAPES February 12, 2025