Judgment no. 269/2017 and dual preliminarity in the evolution of the jurisprudence of the Italian constitutional court GIORGIO REPETTO TABLE OF CONTENTS1. Judgment No. 269/2017: the reasons and the direction of a turning point 2. The patterns of the case law of the ItCC after 2017: settlement, enlargement, loyalty 3. Open issues I: how free is the concurrence between judicial remedies? 4. Open issues II: contextual preliminarity? 5. Open issues III: dual preliminarity beyond the Charter? 6. The internal point of view: centralized constitutional review vs. interpenetration of national and European legality Download this article in PDF format Download IJPL Vol.15 - 1 Read more articles Previous PostThe «dual preliminarity» doctrine in the case law of ordinary courts of first instance and appeals Next PostDual preliminarity, today. Evaluating the impact of judgment no. 269/2017 of the Italian Constitutional Court You Might Also Like THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN JUDICIAL SYSTEMS: ETHICS AND EFFICIENCY March 14, 2024 TRANSPARENCY WITHIN THE ARTIFICIAL ADMINISTRATION PRINCIPLES, PATHS, PERSPECTIVES AND PROBLEMS March 14, 2024 METHOD IN CONSTITUTIONAL THEORY BETWEEN NATURE AND ARTEFACT March 14, 2024
TRANSPARENCY WITHIN THE ARTIFICIAL ADMINISTRATION PRINCIPLES, PATHS, PERSPECTIVES AND PROBLEMS March 14, 2024